The computer system and SmarTech had the correct placement, connectivity, and computer experts necessary to change the election in any manner desired by the controllers of the SmarTech computers." This would have only happened if there was a complete failure of the Ohio computer election system.

e. The 2004 United States presidential election in Ohio took place on … Click the thumbnail at the top of the page to see the larger view of the chart. He edits , where his “Fitrakis Files” appear, along with numerous books co-written with Harvey Wasserman.Since Trump took office, Facebook has continually limited your access to progressive media. Dirty tricks occurred across the state, including phony letters from Boards of Elections telling people that their registration through some Democratic activist groups were invalid and that Kerry voters were to report on Wednesday because of massive voter … Fox & Friends completely ignores the sabotage of the United States Postal Service while discussing the delays with any additional coronavirus relief. A grand jury returned indictments against two Indianapolis Metropolitan Police officers accused of using excessive force while arresting two women during the height of protests in downtown Indianapolis. Connell ran the private IT firm GovTech that created the controversial system that transferred Ohio’s vote count late on election night 2004 to a partisan Republican server site in Chattanooga, Tennessee owned by SmarTech. The computer system and SmarTech had the correct placement, connectivity, and computer experts necessary to change the election in any manner desired by the controllers of the SmarTech computers.”Project Censored named the outsourcing of Ohio’s 2004 election votes to SmarTech in Chattanooga, Tennessee to a company owned by Republican partisans as one of the most censored stories in the world.In the Connell deposition, plaintiffs’ attorneys questioned Connell regarding gwb43, a website that was live on election night operating out of the White House and tied directly into SmarTech’s server stacks in Chattanooga, Tennessee which contained Ohio’s 2004 presidential election results.The transfer of the vote count to SmarTech in Chattanooga, Tennessee remains a mystery.

Will you make a one-time or monthly donation today to help?Subscribe to Truthout’s daily newsletter and never miss a story. Unless we raise more money to increase our distribution this will have a devastating effect. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site.

Going back to the old reliable right wing vomit. Allegations of MITM Hack of 2004 Presidential Ohio Election. If there's one takeaway from the Trump campaign's rapid-fire response to Joe Biden choosing Sen. Kamala Harris of California as his running mate, it's that Trump and his supposed operatives have no idea what they're doing. Never. Election security advocates, hackers, political watchdogs, and conspiracy theorists have argued for years that voting machines in Ohio might have been hacked in the 2004 election.

Spoonamore responded: “Yes. It will be greatly appreciated and help us continue our mission of exposing the real FAKE NEWS! This is one story where a picture really is worth a thousand words. Connell ran the private IT firm GovTech that created the controversial system that transferred Ohio's vote count late on election night 2004 to a partisan Republican server site in Chattanooga, Tennessee owned by SmarTech.

“Blackwell freaked and refused to speak to me when I confronted him about it long before I met you,” he wrote to Arnebeck.On December 14, 2007, then-Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner, who replaced Blackwell, released her evaluation and validation of election-related equipment, standards and testing (Everest study) which found that touchscreen voting machines were vulnerable to hacking with relative ease.Until now, the architectural maps and contracts from the Ohio 2004 election were never made public, which may indicate that the entire system was designed for fraud. Liking our page no longer guarantees that you’ll see our posts.Become a Truthout sustainer (or make a one-time donation if you already are). Unless we raise more money to increase our distribution this will have a devastating effect. A new filing in the King Lincoln Bronzeville v. Blackwell case includes a copy of the Ohio Secretary of State election production system configuration that was in use in Ohio’s 2004 presidential election when there was a sudden and unexpected shift in votes for George W. Bush.The filing also includes the revealing deposition of the late Michael Connell. Follow us for first access to the latest news and analysis.

July 29, 2011 by InfoSec News. Click the thumbnail at the top of the page to see the larger view of the chart.

They illustrate how the data flow could have been leveraged to tweak results in Bush's direction under the careful oversight of Ken Blackwell, Ohio's corrupt Secretary of State.A group of academic researchers functioning under the rubric of ePluribus Media discovered and reported, shortly after the 2006 election, that a partisan Republican company, SmarTech, was hosting the Ohio Secretary of State's vote count for both the 2004/2006 elections. In the meantime, let this argument from the brief resonate with each and every one of us who know in our gut that Republicans steal elections they can't win, whether by fraud or by disenfranchisement.The practice of permitting the use of touchscreen electronic voting machines in partisan elections, when such machines are, according to every scientific test and measure are insecure against hacking, and Banish those ads for good with a subscription to the site. If you've already subscribed, consider a one-time or donation of whatever amount you can spare. A mirror site, by contrast, is designed as a backup site in case the main computer configuration fails.Spoonamore claims that he confronted then-Secretary of State Blackwell at a secretary of state IT conference in Boston where he was giving a seminar in data security.

Our daily email newsletter will keep you up to date.